Web Survey Bibliography
Title Onlinebefragungen kostenlos - Der "Befrager"
Author Hansen, C.
Year 2005
Access date 21.04.2005
Abstract A lot of tools for generating online surveys already exist. However, commercial systems are often too expensive and too complex for the occasional user. The free programs available are usually difficult to install and to run and thus form an obstacle to the non-experts.The "Befrager" is a simple tool, which is free of charge, respectively financed by contributions. At http://befrager.chhansen.de the current (beta) version can be found. This version already contains features like different types of questions, filters, user administration, design templates, online return rate monitor, online result monitor, etc. The development strictly follows the "requirements for online-survey-software" by the German "Bundesverbands Markt- und Sozialforscher e.V."It is a totally server-based solution, which means that the user does not have to install software on his local machine{:} an internet browser is all he needs. The generated survey is running on the server as well, thus the user does not need to install, configure and run a web server or look for appropriate hosting offers.The "Befrager" is first of all predestined for the use in a non-commercial, academic environment. It is free of charge and easy to use, therefore especially suitable for students, who want to gather experiences with online surveys.In this session, the tool is presented to potential users. But first of all it shall inspire the audience to discuss which further features are necessary or desirable. Furthermore everyone is invited to join the project, as well on a technical as on a conceptual level. One of the goals of the project is to build up a community which bears and drives the project.
Abstract - optional Es gibt schon eine ganze Reihe von Tools zur Generierung von Onlinebefragungen. Für den Gelegenheitsanwender sind die kommerziellen Systeme aber meist zu teuer und zu komplex. Die bisher frei verfügbaren Programme sind häufig kompliziert zu installieren und zu betreiben und stellen den Nicht-Experten somit vor große Hürden. Der "Befrager" ist ein einfaches Tool, das kostenlos, bzw. auf der Basis von Spenden zur Verfügung gestellt werden soll. Unter http://befrager.chhansen.de liegt die aktuelle (Beta)Version. Diese beinhaltet bereits Features wie verschiedene Fragetypen, Filterführung, Benutzerverwaltung, austauschbare Designs, Onlinerücklaufcontrolling, Onlineergebnisdarstellung, etc. Die Entwicklung orientiert sich eng an den "Anforderungen an Online-Umfrage-Software" des Bundesverbands Markt- und Sozialforscher e.V.Es handelt sich um eine rein serverbasierte Lösung, das heißt, der Nutzer muss keine Software auf seinem Rechner installieren, ein Internetbrowser reicht aus. Auch die eigentliche Befragung wird auf dem Server durchgeführt, somit muss der Nutzer weder einen Webserver konfigurieren, noch nach passenden Hosting-Angeboten suchen.Der "Befrager" ist hauptsächlich für den Einsatz im nicht-kommerziellen bzw. universitären Umfeld prädestiniert. Dadurch, dass er kostenlos genutzt werden kann und einfach zu bedienen ist, eignet er sich besonders für Studenten, die Erfahrungen mit Onlinebefragungen sammeln möchten.In dem Oral presentation wird potentiellen Anwendern das System vorgestellt. Vor Allem aber soll zur Diskussion angeregt werden, welche weiteren Features notwendig, bzw. wünschenswert sind. Weiterhin wird jeder eingeladen, an dem Projekt mit zu arbeiten, sowohl auf technischer als auch auf konzeptioneller Seite. Das letztendliche Ziel des Projektes ist es, eine Community zu bilden, die das Projekt trägt und vorantreibt.
Access/Direct link Homepage - conference (abstract)
Year of publication2005
Bibliographic typeConferences, workshops, tutorials, presentations
Web survey bibliography (4086)
- Displaying Videos in Web Surveys: Implications for Complete Viewing and Survey Responses; 2017; Mendelson, J.; Lee Gibson, J.; Romano Bergstrom, J. C.
- Using experts’ consensus (the Delphi method) to evaluate weighting techniques in web surveys not...; 2017; Toepoel, V.; Emerson, H.
- Mind the Mode: Differences in Paper vs. Web-Based Survey Modes Among Women With Cancer; 2017; Hagan, T. L.; Belcher, S. M.; Donovan, H. S.
- Answering Without Reading: IMCs and Strong Satisficing in Online Surveys; 2017; Anduiza, E.; Galais, C.
- Ideal and maximum length for a web survey; 2017; Revilla, M.; Ochoa, C.
- Social desirability bias in self-reported well-being measures: evidence from an online survey; 2017; Caputo, A.
- Web-Based Survey Methodology; 2017; Wright, K. B.
- Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences; 2017; Liamputtong, P.
- Lessons from recruitment to an internet based survey for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: merits of...; 2017; Davies, B.; Kotter, M. R.
- Web Survey Gamification - Increasing Data Quality in Web Surveys by Using Game Design Elements; 2017; Schacht, S.; Keusch, F.; Bergmann, N.; Morana, S.
- Effects of sampling procedure on data quality in a web survey; 2017; Rimac, I.; Ogresta, J.
- Comparability of web and telephone surveys for the measurement of subjective well-being; 2017; Sarracino, F.; Riillo, C. F. A.; Mikucka, M.
- Achieving Strong Privacy in Online Survey; 2017; Zhou, Yo.; Zhou, Yi.; Chen, S.; Wu, S. S.
- A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Incentives on Response Rate in Online Survey Studies; 2017; Mohammad Asire, A.
- Telephone versus Online Survey Modes for Election Studies: Comparing Canadian Public Opinion and Vote...; 2017; Breton, C.; Cutler, F.; Lachance, S.; Mierke-Zatwarnicki, A.
- Examining Factors Impacting Online Survey Response Ratesin Educational Research: Perceptions of Graduate...; 2017; Saleh, A.; Bista, K.
- Usability Testing for Survey Research; 2017; Geisen, E.; Romano Bergstrom, J. C.
- Paradata as an aide to questionnaire design: Improving quality and reducing burden; 2017; Timm, E.; Stewart, J.; Sidney, I.
- Fieldwork monitoring and managing with time-related paradata; 2017; Vandenplas, C.
- Interviewer effects on onliner and offliner participation in the German Internet Panel; 2017; Herzing, J. M. E.; Blom, A. G.; Meuleman, B.
- Interviewer Gender and Survey Responses: The Effects of Humanizing Cues Variations; 2017; Jablonski, W.; Krzewinska, A.; Grzeszkiewicz-Radulska, K.
- Millennials and emojis in Spain and Mexico.; 2017; Bosch Jover, O.; Revilla, M.
- Where, When, How and with What Do Panel Interviews Take Place and Is the Quality of Answers Affected...; 2017; Niebruegge, S.
- Comparing the same Questionnaire between five Online Panels: A Study of the Effect of Recruitment Strategy...; 2017; Schnell, R.; Panreck, L.
- Nonresponses as context-sensitive response behaviour of participants in online-surveys and their relevance...; 2017; Wetzlehuetter, D.
- Do distractions during web survey completion affect data quality? Findings from a laboratory experiment...; 2017; Wenz, A.
- Predicting Breakoffs in Web Surveys; 2017; Mittereder, F.; West, B. T.
- Measuring Subjective Health and Life Satisfaction with U.S. Hispanics; 2017; Lee, S.; Davis, R.
- Humanizing Cues in Internet Surveys: Investigating Respondent Cognitive Processes; 2017; Jablonski, W.; Grzeszkiewicz-Radulska, K.; Krzewinska, A.
- A Comparison of Emerging Pretesting Methods for Evaluating “Modern” Surveys; 2017; Geisen, E., Murphy, J.
- The Effect of Respondent Commitment on Response Quality in Two Online Surveys; 2017; Cibelli Hibben, K.
- Pushing to web in the ISSP; 2017; Jonsdottir, G. A.; Dofradottir, A. G.; Einarsson, H. B.
- The 2016 Canadian Census: An Innovative Wave Collection Methodology to Maximize Self-Response and Internet...; 2017; Mathieu, P.
- Push2web or less is more? Experimental evidence from a mixed-mode population survey at the community...; 2017; Neumann, R.; Haeder, M.; Brust, O.; Dittrich, E.; von Hermanni, H.
- In search of best practices; 2017; Kappelhof, J. W. S.; Steijn, S.
- Redirected Inbound Call Sampling (RICS); A New Methodology ; 2017; Krotki, K.; Bobashev, G.; Levine, B.; Richards, S.
- An Empirical Process for Using Non-probability Survey for Inference; 2017; Tortora, R.; Iachan, R.
- The perils of non-probability sampling; 2017; Bethlehem, J.
- A Comparison of Two Nonprobability Samples with Probability Samples; 2017; Zack, E. S.; Kennedy, J. M.
- Rates, Delays, and Completeness of General Practitioners’ Responses to a Postal Versus Web-Based...; 2017; Sebo, P.; Maisonneuve, H.; Cerutti, B.; Pascal Fournier, J.; Haller, D. M.
- Necessary but Insufficient: Why Measurement Invariance Tests Need Online Probing as a Complementary...; 2017; Meitinger, K.
- Nonresponse in Organizational Surveying: Attitudinal Distribution Form and Conditional Response Probabilities...; 2017; Kulas, J. T.; Robinson, D. H.; Kellar, D. Z.; Smith, J. A.
- Theory and Practice in Nonprobability Surveys: Parallels between Causal Inference and Survey Inference...; 2017; Mercer, A. W.; Kreuter, F.; Keeter, S.; Stuart, E. A.
- Is There a Future for Surveys; 2017; Miller, P. V.
- Reducing speeding in web surveys by providing immediate feedback; 2017; Conrad, F.; Tourangeau, R.; Couper, M. P.; Zhang, C.
- Social Desirability and Undesirability Effects on Survey Response latencies; 2017; Andersen, H.; Mayerl, J.
- A Working Example of How to Use Artificial Intelligence To Automate and Transform Surveys Into Customer...; 2017; Neve, S.
- A Case Study on Evaluating the Relevance of Some Rules for Writing Requirements through an Online Survey...; 2017; Warnier, M.; Condamines, A.
- Estimating the Impact of Measurement Differences Introduced by Efforts to Reach a Balanced Response...; 2017; Kappelhof, J. W. S.; De Leeuw, E. D.
- Targeted letters: Effects on sample composition and item non-response; 2017; Bianchi, A.; Biffignandi, S.